A Story of Presence, Not Absence
I love being a mom. It is the part of my life I am most proud of. And being a mom to a daughter has been transformative-not because I wouldn’t love a son, but because my daughter has grown me up. She has exposed my weaknesses, sharpened my strengths, and helped me step more fully into myself. Raising her is not just about guiding her; it’s about her guiding me back to who I am.
And yet, despite the joy, the devotion, the stability I work hard to create, I am still called a single mother. A title rarely used in kind light. Rarely used as praise. Unless, of course, it’s attached to a celebrity or someone wealthy enough to make the label glamorous.
What bothers me most is how the phrase defines us by the absence of a father figure, rather than the single-handed nature of the parenting itself.
When a mother is raising a child alone, the family is branded broken. We become the ones who couldn’t keep a man, the ones raising children without “structure.” Because in a patriarchal society, structure is imagined as something only men provide.
Few people pause to ask for details. Few care to understand why a mother is raising her child alone. And yet, it is kind to ask-before the labels, before the judgment.
The truth is, these scenarios are increasing. Not because it’s trendy, not because it’s “cool,” but because life is complicated. Because sometimes a stable home with one stable parent is better than a toxic home with two. Because sometimes dreams of building a family are shattered by tragedy, and recovery takes time before another attempt can be made. Because sometimes, it wasn’t even a choice-we were handed curveballs and had no option but to catch them.
And how absurd is it to call a family “incomplete” when the child is fed, clothed, loved, and most importantly—happy and stable? Isn’t that the very definition of completeness?
The label of “single mother” should not be a scarlet letter. It should not reduce us to what is missing. It should recognize what is present: resilience, courage, and the relentless commitment to raising children with love and stability. Families are not broken because they don’t fit a patriarchal mould. They are broken when love is absent, when care is neglected, when children are left adrift.
So perhaps it’s time to retire the label. Or at least redefine it.
Not as a story of absence, but as a testament to presence.
Not as a broken family, but as a family rebuilt.
Not as a failure, but as proof that love and stability can thrive-even when carried by one set of hands.




Leave a reply to BettyMutua Cancel reply